Blog

Sep 16, 2011

On August 20, 2011 EGA, HEFN and FNTG hosted a webinar featuring the French American Charitable Trust (FACT). Over the past 18 years, FACT has invested in $52 million in grassroots community organizing and in groups that developed leadership and engaged community members for areas in environmental justice, health, and accountability development. As FACT nears its intentional spend-out process at the end of 2011, FACT Director Diane Feeney, Senior Program Office Laura Livoti, and Operations & Grants Manager Myra Bicknell shared FACT’s philanthropic approach and the lessons learned over the course of its grantmaking.

FACT’s mission is to help develop and sustain the field of progressive community organizing and advocacy. They have successfully done just this by building and strengthening their grantees that support low income residents and people of color. FACT decided early on to fund strategies instead of particular issue areas. In this way, grantees such as Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, are able to strengthen their own members and expand their organization (with the help of FACT) to further their cause of increasing public participation in issues such as mountain top coal removal. FACT has seen their grantees come together to vote down proposals, see wins at the federal level, and build healthier communities all at a grassroots level.

In summary, the main lessons FACT have learned that has helped it develop as a successful grantmaker are:

  1. Provide flexible funding through general operating support
  2. Staying with grantees for long terms (FACT has 6 – 18 year plans)
  3. Don’t overly burden grantees with excessive reporting requirements
  4. Giving grantees what they need in order to succeed
  5. Supporting organizations that work in partnerships with others, as well as the coalitions and alliances that they work with
  6. Helping grantees build electrical clout by supporting their c3 voter education and voting strategies
  7. Investing in groups you believe in and developing key relationships of trust over time
  8. Being active in the field and visiting grantees and their work

For More Information:
Visit FACT’s website for more information on their projects. The website will be available until 2016. Or email Ramtin Arablouei at HEFN at rarablouei@hefn.org to access the webinar recording.

Sep 16, 2011

On June 1st, 2011, EGA and Philanthropy New York co-hosted an event in which various organization representatives, foundation members, and consultants met to discuss the latest techniques, challenges, and goals in sustainable agriculture specifically for the northeast region of the US. The field has seen an increase in participation and cooperation spanning different sectors such as the transportation sector and sustainable development.

There have been many success stories and examples of where and how local farming can be used well. Alison Hastings represents an MPO (metropolitan planning organization) based in Philadelphia, PA that supports the development of sustainable agriculture in a way to decrease dependence on fossil fuels. By focusing on transportation, land use practices, and the environment, DVRPC (Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission) helps bridge that gap between local farmers and their markets. Judith LaBelle represents Glynwood, an organization that connects communities with local farmers in the Hudson Valley of NY. Patricia Smith and the Reinvestment Fund works on projects that bring fresh foods into “farm deserts” or areas that do not have any access to any type of fresh food (i.e. produce from local farms, grocery stores, farmers markets).

Yet, the major challenge lies in the fact that drastic changes must occur in our current food systems for sustainable agriculture to be truly long-lasting. The Food Bill is one obstacle that does not permit easy changes for farmers and manufacturers to invest in more sustainable farming. Other challenges include meeting food supply demands from institutions and manufacturers, how to connect and create a transportation sector between farmers and their markets, and how to balance costs and values with our current subsidies system. In addition, future partnerships can be developed between wildlife conservationists in terms of land use and sustainable agriculture that won’t threaten ecosystems or their wildlife and possibly the health insurance industry in which healthy eating habits and actions can be insured.

For Foundations
Sustainable Agriculture is no longer limited to just the farming community. Public-private-community partnerships are also bringing together rural, urban, and suburban communities. These new partnerships open up new opportunities for foundations that include and are not limited to:

  1. Fund NGOs and other organizations that support local farmers both rural and urban.
  2. Support initiatives and projects. Examples include the Pennsylvania Fresh Food Finance Initiative, Glynwood’s Keep Farming, the NY Healthy Foods Healthy Initiative, and NY City Harvest.
  3. Build capacity and help to create a network amongst existing sustainable agriculture systems and communities. Each system is specific in their location and condition. Yet networks can help develop new ideas and build support between each community.
  4. Contribute in grants that support technical assistance for small farming groups, provide subsidies to local farmers, and provide financial support that enable local farmers with food distributors.
Sep 16, 2011

On June 6, 2011 EGA, the International Human Rights Funders Group, and Grantmakers Without Borders hosted a webinar focusing on the connections between environmental issues and human rights arising from proposed and current dam construction in the Amazon. The proposed Belo Monte Dam allows a case study though which grantmakers may view efforts to promote human rights and protect the environment. Although the Brazilian government has already approved the dam’s operating license, the project has come under serious scrutiny by civil society. The result is an increasing need for grassroots action with respect to human rights and environmental policy.

The Accelerated Growth Program has shown that projects are being pushed forward by interested parties such as the Brazilian Development Bank. Efforts to bring the matter to national courts have been rather ineffective. However, in many of these cases human rights and environmental issues transcend political boundaries, creating an opportunity to address them in a recognized international forum such as the Inter-American Court on Human Rights (IACHR), which can both set a positive precedent with regards to international human rights and environmental norms as well as increase public awareness.

The energy produced by the dams largely would be allocated to energy-intensive products such as aluminum, which are often exported to nations with higher manufacturing capacities like China. The actors who benefit are completely removed from impacted peoples. Dam projects such as the Belo Monte divert upwards of 80 percent of the river, meaning huge impacts to both biodiversity as well as the local population. While protests by locals have been effective in the past, the hierarchical structure of investment and construction employed today renders these small-scale protest measures ineffective. The lack of participatory democracy and transparency is indicative of the close relationship between the dam industry and senior bureaucracy; therefore it must be a key goal of funders today to aid grassroots organizations, allowing them the ability to disseminate information that counters the propaganda that is currently being spread throughout both rural and urban populations. Further, the power of interested parties in international bodies such as OAS indicates a need to support national NGOs and implement a coordinated strategy that focuses on strengthening an overall respect for human rights, which would ideally translate into the delaying or cancellation of many dam projects.

For Foundations The ability of foundations to make resources available on short notice is key. Often times, funding goes directly to democratic participatory efforts such as translating complex information to local organizations, which then are able to mobilize communities. The central lesson is the importance of grassroots organizations and education, as they both allow for the population to be informed of current events and potentially speak out against them. Other lessons include, but are not limited to:

1) Increase resources available for development of communication strategies and exchange of experiences among organizations.

2) Support independent research, which is has in the past refuted the findings of environmental impact assessments and delayed construction of dam projects.

3) Aid organizations that utilize a variety of legal tools to promote human rights and hold key players accountable by investigating human rights or environmental violations.

4) Support the development of a viable alternative energy strategy to show that more efficient ways of producing energy exist.

5) Support local organizations comprised of members directly connected to the issues; work with indigenous people and groups who possess in-depth knowledge of the region.

Sep 16, 2011

On May 26, 2011, EGA and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund co-hosted an event that brought together funders, leading environmental lawyers, and NGO representatives to discuss a new approach towards taking action on climate change: litigation. Possible solutions are to use existing state to state strategies in which one country can sue another for damages by climate change (i.e. Article 14 of the UNFCCC or the dispute mechanism of UNCLOS). Another is for climate change to be heard in human rights cases in which the rights of affected populations are being threatened (i.e. threats to freshwater in the Americas or indigenous rights like the Inuit). Lastly, climate change issues can be further used in claims made in both US and EU courts (i.e. Micronesia vs. Czech Republic).

The ultimate goal is to effect policy changes and further energize the climate movement by exposing and publicizing efforts made towards mitigating and/or adapting to climate change. Some challenges from using international litigation are that decisions are not always binding for countries or individuals under UNFCCC or UNCLOS and actions are under consent. Often times, international bodies such as UNCLOS and the ICJ (International Court of Justice) have long processes in order to get two countries to even reach an agreement in a case, again, not always binding.  In addition, it is very difficult to find plaintiffs for cases; how does one make a case against large, powerful industrial states that dictate trade and aid relations? Antonio Oposa, an international environmental lawyer, advocates that children should be used more as plaintiffs because they are the ones that will have to inherit the changed earth. The effects of climate change are becoming more apparent, as there has been increase in human rights cases and coastal and island countries’ economies are being threatened.  Climate change litigation may prove to be a very effective action tool.

Information for Foundations

  1. Using environmental law to take action towards climate change is still a very new and developing field. Current opportunities for Foundations include and are not limited to:
  2. Fund campaigns around climate change cases. It is often very difficult for lawyers to be campaigners themselves, especially when court orders restrain them from being able to publicly share information about such cases.
  3. Build capacity and support NGOs and other organizations that have a litigation department. Examples include Greenpeace International, Earthjustice, and Earth Rights International.
  4. Back research and fact-finding initiatives in order to build cases.
  5. Support and help to create a network amongst international environmental lawyers, other legal bodies, communities, NGOs, and members in different governmental levels to open communication, support and strengthen one another, and coordinate efforts.
Sep 16, 2011

On August 10th, 2011, the Funders’ Network for Smart Growth and Livable Communities, the Environmental Grantmakers Association, and Stormwater Funders Group held a webinar regarding stormwater regulations and low impact development (LID), and how the relating economic aspects may influence developers’ decisions. The idea, especially given trying economic times, is that costly redevelopment programs in urban areas can potentially drive developers into pristine areas, which lack the constrictions of pre-existing infrastructure, allowing them a higher level of access, control, and freedom. While environmental conscious redevelopment in cities is noble, the expansion of development outward from cities would cancel out the gains made by urban sustainability initiatives.

There are few regulations for controlling non-point polluted runoff, and the EPA is currently developing new rules that would yield stricter stormwater standards. As one of the few regulatory tools organizations have to work with, the Clean Water Act is rather insufficient with respect to urban runoff. However, as a one-size-fits-all solution the Act limits flexibility, one characteristic vital to (re)development which is not only site-specific but also incorporates a variety of other factors, from transportation infrastructure to zoning and finance rules, making each situation unique. These local factors often times tilt the playing field towards new development rather than redevelopment. Thus, given potentially stronger regulations and economic incentives, one question that this webinar sought to answer was, “how do you get the [urban] areas cleaned up without inadvertently increasing new development?”

A combination of strict standards and green infrastructure seems to hold the key, but without data to back it up, any environmental advocate’s arguments are unsubstantiated. Thus, ECONorthwest conducted a study seeking to answer the research question, “would more stringent stormwater regulations have the unintended consequence of shifting development to ‘greenfield’ sites from already-disturbed redevelopment and infill sites?” The results of the study conducted hold several vital conclusions, and remind us how imperative it for like-minded groups to organize so that they may take on the challenge of shaping regulations and incentives.

Among the findings presented by ECONorthwest’s Senior Economist Ed MacMullan was the observation that developers were not abandoning their redevelopment projects because of stronger stormwater standards. Compliance with stormwater regulations is one of many economic and regulatory factors that developers take into account. In fact, green development, especially in urban areas, may actually be more profitable (in addition to being more sustainable) because of its ability to influence buyers’ desires. Green amenities such as rooftop gardens or LEED-certified buildings generally let both developers and the engineers charge a premium for their products, encouraging more sustainable redevelopment by developers. Further, it has been noted that these economic factors may complement the current regulatory weaknesses.

The major take-away message is that “cost-effective responses to stronger stormwater standards require a more collaborative approach.” As materials and technologies become more widely available and less costly, there is a market incentive for redevelopment. Funders may work with organizations to educate engineers on LID and the relevant permitting processes, as it is still perceived as somewhat new and economically risky in many areas. Fast-track permitting seems to be the most common incentive, while direct subsidies would also offset costs and make LID even more palatable to developers. Therefore, it is also important to support those who seek to work with government agencies in order to streamline – but not detract from – the permitting process. Proper regulation coupled with market incentives has the ability to drive redevelopment and low-impact development, and if done correctly, it can significant reduce our impact on the environment.

Sep 16, 2011

Originally posted on Greenbiz.com

"When is comes to controversial issues, population is in a class by itself. Activist working to reduce global population growth are attacked by the Left for supposedly ignoring human-rights issues or glossing over Western over-consumption. They are attacked by the Right for supposedly favoring widespread abortion and promiscuity. Others think the problem will be solved by technology.

One thing is certain: The planet and its resources are finite and it can not support an infinite population of humans or any other species. A second thing is also certain: The issue of population is too important to avoid just because it is controversial."

Thus begins a fantastic, and chilling, chapter entitled "Population: The Multiplier of Everything Else" by WIlliam Ryerson of the Population Media Center in a must-read book entitled The Post-Carbon Reader, edited by Richard Heinberg and Daniel Lerch. Heinberg is well-known for popularizing the Peak Oil concept and is Senior Fellow-in-Residence at the Post Carbon Institute.

The Post Carbon Institute has gathered 29 of the world's leading experts to point the way to a more resilient, just, and sustainable world. The Post-Carbon Reader is a comprehensive, in-depth examination of the inter-connected sustainability crises humanity now faces. Rather than just being a gloom and doom book representative of the genre, each author brings forth solutions and positive trends affected the issue about which they write.

It can be challenging to bear witness to the enormity of the challenges associated with providing food, water, and energy to a growing worldwide population. Sustainability advocates can veer towards pessimism and hopelessness in the face of so much discouraging news. On the other hand, there are many smart and passionate communicators, policy analysts, futurists and activist remind us that positivity is a renewable resource; the mass transformation we are seeking will come from a positive view of the future, not from fear.

Many current media stories about the financial meltdown have asked the question "How could this happen? Why didn't anyone see it coming?" However, many people did see the warning signs arise as early as 2005 and started asking pointed questions about the sustainability of the housing boom and sub-prime lending. The contributors to the Post Carbon Reader are in a similar position. While it may be easy to dismiss their warning about upcoming shortages of all the basic materials upon which modern society is based, we would be wise to heed their cry and study their solutions. The Post Carbon Institute is doing great work to popularize realistic solutions to the world's biggest problems.

Sep 16, 2011

By Jim Jubelirer, Sustainable Futures

My friends Pete May and Joel Makower at GreenBiz have produced their fourth annual edition of the State of Green Business report. The report continues GreenBiz's efforts to measure the environmental impacts of the emerging green economy. This year's report shows a continuing shift in mainstream business: Companies are thinking bigger and longer-term about sustainability. Despite the recession, many companies increased their sustainability investments and publicly made bold commitments.

The State of Green Business report makes the good point that progress in sustainable business has occurred in a hostile political environment and despite poor coverage from mainstream media.

"The general lack of political leadership and will — due in large part to a misguided notion that we can’t afford to consider sustainability during tough economic times — is a stark contrast with the far more enlightened, proactive leadership of some corporate leaders. Much of the greening of business remains an untold secret largely ignored by the mainstream media and, in many cases, not widely discussed even by companies."

To conduct their research, GreenBiz combed through 2,200 news reports, blog posts, opinion pieces, and podcasts they published during 2010. Here are the Top 10 Sustainable Business Trends of 2011:

Consumer Giants Awaken to Green
Without much green marketing, the world's biggest brands are setting bold sustainability goals.

Companies Aim for Zero
Large polluters are earnestly finding ways to reduce their footprint.

Developing World Yanks the Supply Chain
The rare earth crisis and conflict minerals are finding their way into mainstream media and public discourses.

Greener Transport Makes its Move
For more than just the Prius and Volt, greener technologies are emerging for cars, trucks, boat, trains, and planes.

Sustainable Food Becomes a Main Course
Sustainable agriculture is now a mainstream concern - Michelle Obama as First Mom and Gardener-in-Chief adds a boost of credibility

Metrics and Standards Become the Rule
Growing requests from numerous stakeholders is increasing the demand for metrics, despite the lack of uniform standards for reporting.

Toxic Concerns Spur Greener Alternatives
Toxics are increasingly unacceptable and the new field of green chemistry is growing rapidly.

Water Footprinting Makes a Splash
We will learn to live without oil (hopefully sooner instead of later) but we cannot live without water. Water-intensive industries like semiconductors and beverages have already been focusing on their water use and now a wider circle of businesses have become aware of the vital nature of water.

Companies Learn to Close the Loop
Closing the loop means reusing, repurposing, and recycling and companies are getting increasingly sophisticated in their closed loop processes.

Bioplastics Become Material
Did you know that coconut husks, mushroom spores, corn byproducts and others are being used to create replacements for paper, plastic and steel?